Top

Unilever commits to 75% sustainable packaging

Posted - August 15, 2010

Unilever commits to 75% sustainable packaging

Unilever made a well-timed move to commit to sustainable sourcing of packaging in July with research studies showing consumers will change purchasing decisions to support this type of ethical commitment. Unilever published its sustainable paper and board packaging sourcing policy as part of its commitment to double the size of the business while reducing its environmental impact.

The policy outlines the Unilever

Send your comments to: editorial@organicwellnessnews.com

Repackaging the organic revolution

Posted - August 15, 2009

Special Report
Repackaging the organic revolution

By Angela West

Consumers are changing. Growing concern for global warming, health related issues, the huge amount of waste still generated daily in the post-consumer society, and the current economic recession, are factors affecting consumer purchasing decisions and lifestyles. Products are now expected to reflect changing values. It is no longer enough to supply an organic certified product if it is not presented in a unique, eco-friendly, convenient and safe packaging. To meet consumer preference for more sustainable products, European and North American retailers from Whole Foods Market to Tesco, and manufacturers from Nature’s Path to ConAgra Foods’ Healthy Choice are switching to more sustainable and recyclable packaging.

As a recent Ipsos Marketing survey of 23,000 consumers in 18 countries suggests, consumers may be willing to ditch convenient packaging for ‘greener’ packaging, while the food itself should include fresh ingredients and contain health benefits. Awareness of greener packaging may be growing partly due to recent media attention, Ipsos says.

Examining a new packaging solution may make an impact on our bottom line that was never considered before. Glass may not be too expensive, recycled plastics may be cheaper than the virgin plastics you are using, and cans may end up being your solution of choice. After weighing each option, it is possible that your company can save a significant amount of money by choosing an alternative that is better for the environment as well.

In this and next issues, OWN will present different packaging options to consider: glass, PET, bioplastics and metal in this edition.There are other alternatives out there and other questions to be asked on a subject that customers have indicated matters to them very much. Many no longer trust plastics due to their proven potential to leach into food. Most are also wary of the environmental and other costs of corn-based bioplastics and the use of bisphenol A (BPA) in plastics.

Send your comments to: editorial@organicwellnessnews.com

Earthbound and Naked will use only post-consumer recycled packaging

Posted - July 27, 2009

Earthbound and Naked will use only post-consumer recycled packaging

O.W.N. News Network

This month, Earthbound Farm and Naked Juice announced their decision to only use packaging made with 100 percent post-consumer recycled (PCR) content.

Earthbound claims to be the first firm in the fresh produce sector to switch the plastic for all its clamshell packages to 100 percent Post-Consumer Recycled PolyEthylene Terephthalate (PCR PET). This initiative is part of the celebration of the company

Send your comments to: editorial@organicwellnessnews.com

Organic consumers prefer glass containers

Posted - July 24, 2009

Organic consumers prefer glass containers

O.W.N. News Network

Glass continues to be the first choice of packaging for most health-conscious organic shoppers, concludes a survey conducted by the University of Oklahoma and the Glass Packaging Institute (GPI), the trade association representing the North American glass container industry. According to the poll, most health-conscious organic shoppers believe glass keeps the true flavor and taste (79.8%) and purity (77.3%) of a food product. Glass also continues to be the first choice of the organic shopper by wide margins compared to other forms of packaging for health (77%), quality (67.7%), and preserving product shelf life (67.7%).

Send your comments to: editorial@organicwellnessnews.com

Canada Prepares National Regulations

Posted - September 9, 2008

Being

Send your comments to: editorial@organicwellnessnews.com

Sustainably-Packaged German Snacks

Posted - July 30, 2008

Herr Foods Furthers Sustainably with Pump Retrofit

Germany

Send your comments to: editorial@organicwellnessnews.com

Organic Cosmetics Standards

Posted - July 15, 2008

Varied Requirements, Little Regulation Bring US Lawsuit

Organic-branded cosmetics and personal care products are coming under legal question in the US. A lawsuit was recently launched by soap and cosmetics firm Dr. Bronner

Send your comments to: editorial@organicwellnessnews.com

Garbage

Posted - May 1, 2008

Still Too Much Garbage!

By Sofi

Send your comments to: editorial@organicwellnessnews.com

TerraCycle

Posted - May 1, 2008

From Worms to Wealth

By Adrian Larose - as printed in O.W.N. Summer 2008

Making money from millions of empty juice pouches and drained-out pop bottles might sound like a difficult prospect, but that’s what TerraCycle is doing. TerraCycle works with mainstream companies like Wal-Mart, Home Depot and Kraft Foods. Working with these companies, says CEO and co-founder Tom Skazy, is exactly what is needed to move consumers towards environmentally-friendly products.

Skazy insists that discovering new ways to work with the mainstream in an eco-capitalist fashion is the only sustainable approach. Starting during Skazy’s university studies with an organic worm-poop compost product, his firm TerraCycle has grown from US $70,000 turnover in 2004 to $3.5 million in 2006, with $7 million likely in 2008.

Hungarian-born but raised in Canada, Skazy discovered that worm poop is a very effective fertilizer. He also realized that the main ingredient, garbage, is readily available - it’s “simply a commodity that people are willing to pay to get rid of,” he says. “Waste doesn’t exist in nature,” he adds: it’s a human-made problem.

With this ready supply of ingredients, Skazy obtained funding through business plan contests. Selling a product made from waste was not enough for the firm, though: soon, it also began to package its product in containers usually seen as waste.

“Since we make a product from garbage, why don’t we package it in garbage?” Skazy says of the group’s thinking. Visiting area recycling centers, TerraCycle learned that plastic pop bottles are standardized enough to be cheap, practical non-food packaging. The “world’s first and still only products made and packaged entirely out of garbage” were born, Skazy says. Remove the old labels from the bottles, wash them out and re-fill: you’re ready to roll. (TerraCycle is not packaging food, which would have different requirements.)

The company is built on three brand criteria for all products, such as the cleaners it now also makes. First, TerraCycle’s product must work better than the typical one it replaces. Second, the product must be made with the greenest ingredients - often items previously viewed as waste. Third, the product must cost less or not much more than typical offerings.

“It’s the price that’s the big issue,” Skazy says of environmentally-friendly goods. “Usually, eco-friendly products are more expensive and they don’t work as well. That’s what people think.” The solution: find ways to work within the system that let your firm save money while it helps the environment, so you can provide the consumer an affordable product. Working from waste is one option.

To get enough empty pop bottles for its fertilizer, TerraCycle began paying collection locations - schools and churches, for instance. These locations send in empties under a program called the “bottle brigade” that now has about 4,000 participating US locations. By returning empties, the groups earn money for charitable causes and save TerraCycle laborious collection work.

TerraCycle has partnered with firms like Clif Bar, Stonyfield Farm and Honest Tea to collect their empty, non-recyclable packages, and has a US $1 million deal to collect Capri Sun juice pouches for Kraft. As of writing, the firm was in the final planning stages of a $1 million deal with Oreo.

The basic business model for such deals sees the sponsor company cover all costs to get empty packages to TerraCycle’s factory, Skazy says, such as collection and publicity costs. Locations that offer to collect empty packages receive two to six cents a package towards a charitable cause. Meanwhile, TerraCycle receives free raw ingredients - the empty packaging. It can then manufacture pencil cases, bags and other goods out of the waste, selling the end products for as little as $2 retail for pencil cases. Each year, the brigade programs collects millions of Capri Sun juice pouches from 850 schools.

Good media coverage, and lots of it, is the main benefit for the sponsor, Skazy says. More and more firms are likely to sign up for such programs. “All these big companies are looking to embrace this right now, so we’re in a very fortunate position,” he says.

“Really where it has to happen is Wal-Mart,” he says of the shift towards environmental products. “I’m not an environmentalist. I think I’m very much the average person. I don’t drive a hybrid car. I don’t go out of my way to eat organic food,” Skazy adds. To get such people to choose environmentally-friendly products, those products must be better in every way than others.

The most important ingredient for environmentally-friendly products to succeed, what Skazy calls “the holy grail” , is not to try and make the customer care about your product’s values, but “to make them choose your product without having to care.” Choosing sustainable options must not feel like a sacrifice, but simply be the obvious, best, ordinary choice. Terracycle products have succeeded here.

Even many of the green-oriented people attending the Green Jobs Conference held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania this March admitted to Skazy that they sometimes choose price over environment. During his speech at the conference, Skazy asked audience members whether they bought organic bananas at the current premium cost, and only one third of the supposedly forward-thinking audience members raised their hands.

But if the price of organic vs conventional bananas was similar? Who would buy organic then? Everyone raised their hands.

Send your comments to: editorial@organicwellnessnews.com

US Campaign Against GMOs Targets Consumers

Posted - April 11, 2008

New Initiatives to Control GMO Products in the United States

GMOs will soon be off everyone’s table, if Jeffrey Smith has his way. His Institute for Responsible Technology is launching a major initiative that will have food companies racing to replace GM ingredients. The Campaign for Healthy Eating in America, Smith says, is designed to reach the tipping point of consumer rejection of GMOs before the end of 2009.

Ten years ago, virtually all major food companies committed to remove GMOs from their European brands within a single week. In the US, a response to Monsanto’s rbGH (GM bovine growth hormone) began two years ago, when Starbucks, Krogers, and 40 out of 100 top dairies removed these products. Wal-Mart declared their milk rbGH free this March. “The common link to these tipping points,” says Smith, “is that consumers became aware of the health dangers and were given choice. Since GMOs offer no consumer advantages, even a small percentage of consumers making brand choices based their non-GMO status will cause food companies to respond.”

Smith has traveled to 30 countries speaking on the health dangers of genetically modified foods. “Convincing consumers to shun GMOs has become easy,” says Smith, “since the evidence of problems is now overwhelming and irrefutable.” These dangers are compiled in Smith’s new book, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods. With input from more than 30 scientists over two years, Genetic Roulette presents 65 health risks of GM foods and why current safety assessments are not competent to protect us from most of them. Former UK environment minister Michael Meacher says the revelations in Genetic Roulette may “change the global course of events this century.” It’s presented in the same clear, accessible style that made Jeffrey’s first book, Seeds of Deception, the world’s best-selling and number 1 rated book on genetically engineered foods.

The Campaign for Healthier Eating is providing the compelling evidence on GMO dangers for health conscious shoppers. Natural food stores will feature Non-GMO Education Centers containing books, brochures, CDs, DVDs, and Non-GMO Shopping Guides to make it easy for shoppers to identify non-GMO products on store shelves.

The Institute and its coalition partners are helping to inspire the entire North American natural food industry to remove all remaining GM ingredients, providing ample choice for thoroughly educated non-GMO shoppers.

The first Non-GMO Shopping Guides should be available this Summer, with electronic and print circulation expected in the tens of millions. The Institute will also print the Guide in magazines and circulate copies to healthcare professionals, schools and parents and religious groups.

“Consumers are on the top of the food chain,” says Smith, “and together, we can move the marketplace.”

For more: http://www.responsibletechnology.org

Send your comments to: editorial@organicwellnessnews.com

Bottom